All projects

Bio-based packaging — grant appendix

Low riskAnalyst reviewedAgriPolymers Research · Screening · Grant support
Monte Carlo uncertainty - Bio blend

Bio-based blend confidence and risk distribution

Summarize the modeled interval, assumption quality, and reviewer guidance for per compostable tray, screening cradle-to-gate before results are used in reports or claims.

Needs review10,000 runs
Median impact
4,200kg CO2e
Grant pilot P50 result
90% interval
60%
3,053-5,567 kg CO2e
Exceedance risk
35%
Above the project review bound
Review gates
1of 4
0 uncertainty actions resolved
Low confidenceReviewer context required

Agricultural feedstock distance is driving the upper uncertainty tail.

The P5-P95 interval spans 3,053 to 5,567 kg CO2e. Treat comparative language as bounded until imported starch proxy is attached or explicitly disclosed.

Confidence interval
P5 / P50 / P95
P5 3,053P50 4,200P95 5,567
Distribution

Simulation buckets

Frequency of total GWP outcomes across the Monte Carlo run.

Grant pilot / kg CO2e
7%
3.1k-3.5k
18%
3.5k-3.9k
31%
3.9k-4.3k
24%
4.3k-4.7k
14%
4.7k-5.1k
6%
5.1k-5.6k
Risk distribution

Claim-readiness spread

48%
usable with caveats
  • Within expected range48%
  • Needs reviewer context35%
  • Not claim-ready17%
Contribution context

Hotspots under uncertainty

Bio blend process shares used as uncertainty anchors.

  • Bio-based resin production1,596 kg
    38%
  • Agricultural feedstock cultivation1,008 kg
    24%
  • Film extrusion and thermoforming756 kg
    18%
  • Packaging transport462 kg
    11%
  • Compostability testing overhead378 kg
    9%
Data quality

Uncertainty drivers

Parameters contributing most to interval width.

4 drivers
DriverQuality signalVariance shareReviewer note
Certified bio-based resin shareMedium confidence34%Grant appendix should show how certified resin share changes the screening result.
Extrusion electricity factorMedium confidence28%Confirm renewable procurement assumptions before the grant-ready scenario is exported.
Tray massHigh confidence23%Mass bounds are stable enough for grant appendix sensitivity.
Agricultural feedstock distanceLow confidence16%Bound regional feedstock sourcing before the grant comparison is used externally.