Bio-based packaging — grant appendix
Low riskAnalyst reviewedAgriPolymers Research · Screening · Grant supportBio-based blend confidence and risk distribution
Summarize the modeled interval, assumption quality, and reviewer guidance for per compostable tray, screening cradle-to-gate before results are used in reports or claims.
Agricultural feedstock distance is driving the upper uncertainty tail.
The P5-P95 interval spans 3,053 to 5,567 kg CO2e. Treat comparative language as bounded until imported starch proxy is attached or explicitly disclosed.
Simulation buckets
Frequency of total GWP outcomes across the Monte Carlo run.
Claim-readiness spread
- Within expected range48%
- Needs reviewer context35%
- Not claim-ready17%
Hotspots under uncertainty
Bio blend process shares used as uncertainty anchors.
- Bio-based resin production1,596 kg38%
- Agricultural feedstock cultivation1,008 kg24%
- Film extrusion and thermoforming756 kg18%
- Packaging transport462 kg11%
- Compostability testing overhead378 kg9%
Uncertainty drivers
Parameters contributing most to interval width.
| Driver | Quality signal | Variance share | Reviewer note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certified bio-based resin share | Medium confidence | 34% | Grant appendix should show how certified resin share changes the screening result. |
| Extrusion electricity factor | Medium confidence | 28% | Confirm renewable procurement assumptions before the grant-ready scenario is exported. |
| Tray mass | High confidence | 23% | Mass bounds are stable enough for grant appendix sensitivity. |
| Agricultural feedstock distance | Low confidence | 16% | Bound regional feedstock sourcing before the grant comparison is used externally. |